summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorCyril Chemparathy <cyril@ti.com>2012-09-21 11:56:13 -0400
committerTushar Behera <tushar.behera@linaro.org>2013-01-22 11:41:29 +0530
commit3e086c7fe56d2a416e2f7b1293cd637c45cad6ae (patch)
treeb9790d52976471e24571a8851b709ac2a9d8f323
parentaff03f6bd7cf0802a1a53d4dc893cf4fc96e70cb (diff)
downloadlinux-topics-3e086c7fe56d2a416e2f7b1293cd637c45cad6ae.tar.gz
ARM: mm: use physical addresses in highmem sanity checks
This patch modifies the highmem sanity checking code to use physical addresses instead. This change eliminates the wrap-around problems associated with the original virtual address based checks, and this simplifies the code a bit. The one constraint imposed here is that low physical memory must be mapped in a monotonically increasing fashion if there are multiple banks of memory, i.e., x < y must => pa(x) < pa(y). Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@ti.com> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
-rw-r--r--arch/arm/mm/mmu.c22
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
index 59eeb5c20bd..d473e59cff2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
@@ -950,6 +950,7 @@ phys_addr_t arm_lowmem_limit __initdata = 0;
void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
{
int i, j, highmem = 0;
+ phys_addr_t vmalloc_limit = __pa(vmalloc_min - 1) + 1;
for (i = 0, j = 0; i < meminfo.nr_banks; i++) {
struct membank *bank = &meminfo.bank[j];
@@ -959,8 +960,7 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
highmem = 1;
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
- if (__va(bank->start) >= vmalloc_min ||
- __va(bank->start) < (void *)PAGE_OFFSET)
+ if (bank->start >= vmalloc_limit)
highmem = 1;
bank->highmem = highmem;
@@ -969,8 +969,8 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
* Split those memory banks which are partially overlapping
* the vmalloc area greatly simplifying things later.
*/
- if (!highmem && __va(bank->start) < vmalloc_min &&
- bank->size > vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start)) {
+ if (!highmem && bank->start < vmalloc_limit &&
+ bank->size > vmalloc_limit - bank->start) {
if (meminfo.nr_banks >= NR_BANKS) {
printk(KERN_CRIT "NR_BANKS too low, "
"ignoring high memory\n");
@@ -979,12 +979,12 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
(meminfo.nr_banks - i) * sizeof(*bank));
meminfo.nr_banks++;
i++;
- bank[1].size -= vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start);
- bank[1].start = __pa(vmalloc_min - 1) + 1;
+ bank[1].size -= vmalloc_limit - bank->start;
+ bank[1].start = vmalloc_limit;
bank[1].highmem = highmem = 1;
j++;
}
- bank->size = vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start);
+ bank->size = vmalloc_limit - bank->start;
}
#else
bank->highmem = highmem;
@@ -1004,8 +1004,7 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
* Check whether this memory bank would entirely overlap
* the vmalloc area.
*/
- if (__va(bank->start) >= vmalloc_min ||
- __va(bank->start) < (void *)PAGE_OFFSET) {
+ if (bank->start >= vmalloc_limit) {
printk(KERN_NOTICE "Ignoring RAM at %.8llx-%.8llx "
"(vmalloc region overlap).\n",
(unsigned long long)bank->start,
@@ -1017,9 +1016,8 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
* Check whether this memory bank would partially overlap
* the vmalloc area.
*/
- if (__va(bank->start + bank->size - 1) >= vmalloc_min ||
- __va(bank->start + bank->size - 1) <= __va(bank->start)) {
- unsigned long newsize = vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start);
+ if (bank->start + bank->size > vmalloc_limit)
+ unsigned long newsize = vmalloc_limit - bank->start;
printk(KERN_NOTICE "Truncating RAM at %.8llx-%.8llx "
"to -%.8llx (vmalloc region overlap).\n",
(unsigned long long)bank->start,