aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/libstdc++
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFengwei Yin <fengwei.yin@intel.com>2012-03-28 17:25:17 +0800
committerJack Ren <jack.ren@intel.com>2012-04-16 14:20:30 +0800
commitee18fb4aacc9b67b397a0b000dda6e350ad5b3f0 (patch)
tree1b0359779dc381a7f2cf91220c5318ba2e4b87b9 /libstdc++
parent6bc18fa58849a4307cf6ddcfd526d9258e8175fc (diff)
downloadbionic-ee18fb4aacc9b67b397a0b000dda6e350ad5b3f0.tar.gz
libstdc++: Fix x86 thread-safe one-time-construction implementation.
The root of the problem is that the existing implementation is based on the ARM C++ ABI, which mandates a different guard variable layout than the Itanium/x86 C++ one. This patch modifies the implementation in a way that satisfies both ABIs (and doesn't require changing the toolchains). Change-Id: I885e9adc7f088b9c0a78355bd752f1e6aeec9f07 Signed-off-by: Fengwei Yin <fengwei.yin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jack Ren <jack.ren@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bruce Beare <bruce.j.beare@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'libstdc++')
-rw-r--r--libstdc++/src/one_time_construction.cpp92
1 files changed, 74 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/libstdc++/src/one_time_construction.cpp b/libstdc++/src/one_time_construction.cpp
index 2a44c79d1..00adce9fb 100644
--- a/libstdc++/src/one_time_construction.cpp
+++ b/libstdc++/src/one_time_construction.cpp
@@ -10,46 +10,102 @@
#include <stddef.h>
#include <sys/atomics.h>
+#include <endian.h>
#include <bionic_futex.h>
#include <bionic_atomic_inline.h>
-extern "C" int __cxa_guard_acquire(int volatile * gv)
+// ARM C++ ABI and Itanium/x86 C++ ABI has different definition for
+// one time construction:
+//
+// ARM C++ ABI defines the LSB of guard variable should be tested
+// by compiler-generated code before calling __cxa_guard_acquire et al.
+//
+// The Itanium/x86 C++ ABI defines the low-order _byte_ should be
+// tested instead.
+//
+// Meanwhile, guard variable are 32bit aligned for ARM, and 64bit
+// aligned for x86.
+//
+// Reference documentation:
+//
+// section 3.2.3 of ARM IHI 0041C (for ARM)
+// section 3.3.2 of the Itanium C++ ABI specification v1.83 (for x86).
+//
+// There is no C++ ABI available for other ARCH. But the gcc source
+// shows all other ARCH follow the definition of Itanium/x86 C++ ABI.
+
+
+#if defined(__arm__)
+// The ARM C++ ABI mandates that guard variable are
+// 32-bit aligned, 32-bit values. And only its LSB is tested by
+// the compiler-generated code before calling
+// __cxa_guard_acquire.
+//
+typedef union {
+ int volatile state;
+ int32_t aligner;
+} _guard_t;
+
+const static int ready = 0x1;
+const static int pending = 0x2;
+const static int waiting = 0x6;
+
+#else // GCC sources indicates all none-arm follow the same ABI
+// The Itanium/x86 C++ ABI mandates that guard variables
+// are 64-bit aligned, 64-bit values. Also, the least-significant
+// byte is tested by the compiler-generated code before, we calling
+// __cxa_guard_acquire. We can access it through the first
+// 32-bit word in the union below.
+//
+typedef union {
+ int volatile state;
+ int64_t aligner;
+} _guard_t;
+
+const static int ready = letoh32(0x1);
+const static int pending = letoh32(0x100);
+const static int waiting = letoh32(0x10000);
+#endif
+
+extern "C" int __cxa_guard_acquire(_guard_t* gv)
{
- // 0 -> 2, return 1
- // 2 -> 6, wait and return 0
- // 6 untouched, wait and return 0
- // 1 untouched, return 0
+ // 0 -> pending, return 1
+ // pending -> waiting, wait and return 0
+ // waiting: untouched, wait and return 0
+ // ready: untouched, return 0
+
retry:
- if (__atomic_cmpxchg(0, 0x2, gv) == 0) {
+ if (__atomic_cmpxchg(0, pending, &gv->state) == 0) {
ANDROID_MEMBAR_FULL();
return 1;
}
- __atomic_cmpxchg(0x2, 0x6, gv); // Indicate there is a waiter
- __futex_wait(gv, 0x6, NULL);
+ __atomic_cmpxchg(pending, waiting, &gv->state); // Indicate there is a waiter
+ __futex_wait(&gv->state, waiting, NULL);
- if(*gv != 1) // __cxa_guard_abort was called, let every thread try since there is no return code for this condition
+ if (gv->state != ready) // __cxa_guard_abort was called, let every thread try since there is no return code for this condition
goto retry;
ANDROID_MEMBAR_FULL();
return 0;
}
-extern "C" void __cxa_guard_release(int volatile * gv)
+extern "C" void __cxa_guard_release(_guard_t* gv)
{
- // 2 -> 1
- // 6 -> 1, and wake
+ // pending -> ready
+ // waiting -> ready, and wake
+
ANDROID_MEMBAR_FULL();
- if (__atomic_cmpxchg(0x2, 0x1, gv) == 0) {
+ if (__atomic_cmpxchg(pending, ready, &gv->state) == 0) {
return;
}
- *gv = 0x1;
- __futex_wake(gv, 0x7fffffff);
+ gv->state = ready;
+ __futex_wake(&gv->state, 0x7fffffff);
}
-extern "C" void __cxa_guard_abort(int volatile * gv)
+extern "C" void __cxa_guard_abort(_guard_t* gv)
{
ANDROID_MEMBAR_FULL();
- *gv = 0;
- __futex_wake(gv, 0x7fffffff);
+ gv->state= 0;
+ __futex_wake(&gv->state, 0x7fffffff);
}