summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/random/package.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/random/package.html')
-rw-r--r--src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/random/package.html132
1 files changed, 132 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/random/package.html b/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/random/package.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9978ca0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/random/package.html
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+<html>
+<!--
+ Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+
+ http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+
+ Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ limitations under the License.
+ -->
+ <!-- $Revision: 1054186 $ $Date: 2011-01-01 03:28:46 +0100 (sam. 01 janv. 2011) $ -->
+ <body>
+ <p>Random number and random data generators.</p>
+ <p>Commons-math provides a few pseudo random number generators. The top level interface is RandomGenerator.
+ It is implemented by three classes:
+ <ul>
+ <li>{@link org.apache.commons.math.random.JDKRandomGenerator JDKRandomGenerator}
+ that extends the JDK provided generator</li>
+ <li>AbstractRandomGenerator as a helper for users generators</li>
+ <li>BitStreamGenerator which is an abstract class for several generators and
+ which in turn is extended by:
+ <ul>
+ <li>{@link org.apache.commons.math.random.MersenneTwister MersenneTwister}</li>
+ <li>{@link org.apache.commons.math.random.Well512a Well512a}</li>
+ <li>{@link org.apache.commons.math.random.Well1024a Well1024a}</li>
+ <li>{@link org.apache.commons.math.random.Well19937a Well19937a}</li>
+ <li>{@link org.apache.commons.math.random.Well19937c Well19937c}</li>
+ <li>{@link org.apache.commons.math.random.Well44497a Well44497a}</li>
+ <li>{@link org.apache.commons.math.random.Well44497b Well44497b}</li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+ </ul>
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ The JDK provided generator is a simple one that can be used only for very simple needs.
+ The Mersenne Twister is a fast generator with very good properties well suited for
+ Monte-Carlo simulation. It is equidistributed for generating vectors up to dimension 623
+ and has a huge period: 2<sup>19937</sup> - 1 (which is a Mersenne prime). This generator
+ is described in a paper by Makoto Matsumoto and Takuji Nishimura in 1998: <a
+ href="http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~m-mat/MT/ARTICLES/mt.pdf">Mersenne Twister:
+ A 623-Dimensionally Equidistributed Uniform Pseudo-Random Number Generator</a>, ACM
+ Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, Vol. 8, No. 1, January 1998, pp 3--30.
+ The WELL generators are a family of generators with period ranging from 2<sup>512</sup> - 1
+ to 2<sup>44497</sup> - 1 (this last one is also a Mersenne prime) with even better properties
+ than Mersenne Twister. These generators are described in a paper by Fran&ccedil;ois Panneton,
+ Pierre L'Ecuyer and Makoto Matsumoto <a
+ href="http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~lecuyer/myftp/papers/wellrng.pdf">Improved Long-Period
+ Generators Based on Linear Recurrences Modulo 2</a> ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software,
+ 32, 1 (2006). The errata for the paper are in <a
+ href="http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~lecuyer/myftp/papers/wellrng-errata.txt">wellrng-errata.txt</a>.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ For simple sampling, any of these generators is sufficient. For Monte-Carlo simulations the
+ JDK generator does not have any of the good mathematical properties of the other generators,
+ so it should be avoided. The Mersenne twister and WELL generators have equidistribution properties
+ proven according to their bits pool size which is directly linked to their period (all of them
+ have maximal period, i.e. a generator with size n pool has a period 2<sup>n</sup>-1). They also
+ have equidistribution properties for 32 bits blocks up to s/32 dimension where s is their pool size.
+ So WELL19937c for exemple is equidistributed up to dimension 623 (19937/32). This means a Monte-Carlo
+ simulation generating a vector of n variables at each iteration has some guarantees on the properties
+ of the vector as long as its dimension does not exceed the limit. However, since we use bits from two
+ successive 32 bits generated integers to create one double, this limit is smaller when the variables are
+ of type double. so for Monte-Carlo simulation where less the 16 doubles are generated at each round,
+ WELL1024 may be sufficient. If a larger number of doubles are needed a generator with a larger pool
+ would be useful.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ The WELL generators are more modern then MersenneTwister (the paper describing than has been published
+ in 2006 instead of 1998) and fix some of its (few) drawbacks. If initialization array contains many
+ zero bits, MersenneTwister may take a very long time (several hundreds of thousands of iterations to
+ reach a steady state with a balanced number of zero and one in its bits pool). So the WELL generators
+ are better to <i>escape zeroland</i> as explained by the WELL generators creators. The Well19937a and
+ Well44497a generator are not maximally equidistributed (i.e. there are some dimensions or bits blocks
+ size for which they are not equidistributed). The Well512a, Well1024a, Well19937c and Well44497b are
+ maximally equidistributed for blocks size up to 32 bits (they should behave correctly also for double
+ based on more than 32 bits blocks, but equidistribution is not proven at these blocks sizes).
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ The MersenneTwister generator uses a 624 elements integer array, so it consumes less than 2.5 kilobytes.
+ The WELL generators use 6 integer arrays with a size equal to the pool size, so for example the
+ WELL44497b generator uses about 33 kilobytes. This may be important if a very large number of
+ generator instances were used at the same time.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ All generators are quite fast. As an example, here are some comparisons, obtained on a 64 bits JVM on a
+ linux computer with a 2008 processor (AMD phenom Quad 9550 at 2.2 GHz). The generation rate for
+ MersenneTwister was about 27 millions doubles per second (remember we generate two 32 bits integers for
+ each double). Generation rates for other PRNG, relative to MersenneTwister:
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ <table border="1" align="center">
+ <tr BGCOLOR="#CCCCFF"><td colspan="2"><font size="+2">Example of performances</font></td></tr>
+ <tr BGCOLOR="#EEEEFF"><font size="+1"><td>Name</td><td>generation rate (relative to MersenneTwister)</td></font></tr>
+ <tr><td>{@link org.apache.commons.math.random.MersenneTwister MersenneTwister}</td><td>1</td></tr>
+ <tr><td>{@link org.apache.commons.math.random.JDKRandomGenerator JDKRandomGenerator}</td><td>between 0.96 and 1.16</td></tr>
+ <tr><td>{@link org.apache.commons.math.random.Well512a Well512a}</td><td>between 0.85 and 0.88</td></tr>
+ <tr><td>{@link org.apache.commons.math.random.Well1024a Well1024a}</td><td>between 0.63 and 0.73</td></tr>
+ <tr><td>{@link org.apache.commons.math.random.Well19937a Well19937a}</td><td>between 0.70 and 0.71</td></tr>
+ <tr><td>{@link org.apache.commons.math.random.Well19937c Well19937c}</td><td>between 0.57 and 0.71</td></tr>
+ <tr><td>{@link org.apache.commons.math.random.Well44497a Well44497a}</td><td>between 0.69 and 0.71</td></tr>
+ <tr><td>{@link org.apache.commons.math.random.Well44497b Well44497b}</td><td>between 0.65 and 0.71</td></tr>
+ </table>
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ So for most simulation problems, the better generators like {@link
+ org.apache.commons.math.random.Well19937c Well19937c} and {@link
+ org.apache.commons.math.random.Well44497b Well44497b} are probably very good choices.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ Note that <em>none</em> of these generators are suitable for cryptography. They are devoted
+ to simulation, and to generate very long series with strong properties on the series as a whole
+ (equidistribution, no correlation ...). They do not attempt to create small series but with
+ very strong properties of unpredictability as needed in cryptography.
+ </p>
+
+ </body>
+</html>