aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/CONTRIBUTING.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMark Lobodzinski <mark@lunarg.com>2018-01-04 14:55:26 -0700
committerMark Lobodzinski <mark@lunarg.com>2018-01-05 09:01:45 -0700
commitb16a295537922a1a16abd17c9e620e0283d93708 (patch)
treec71af9b0a0c0e60a8abd1b970eabe431d6c8de2d /CONTRIBUTING.md
parent8467279d2b5cd6278c26b94fbe87d8499bb0e6b5 (diff)
downloadvulkan-tools-b16a295537922a1a16abd17c9e620e0283d93708.tar.gz
docs: Add governance doc, Update readme, contributing
Change-Id: I92bebd8a33df564daff1b44633e79b56ffa6ae86
Diffstat (limited to 'CONTRIBUTING.md')
-rw-r--r--CONTRIBUTING.md67
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 31 deletions
diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md
index 7ccbb972..8eb329ee 100644
--- a/CONTRIBUTING.md
+++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md
@@ -1,19 +1,10 @@
## How to Contribute to Vulkan Source Repositories
-### **The Repositories**
-
-The source code for various Vulkan components is distributed across several GitHub repositories.
-The repositories sponsored by Khronos and LunarG are described here.
-In general, the canonical Vulkan Loader and Validation Layers sources are in the Khronos repository,
-while the LunarG repositories host sources for additional tools and sample programs.
+### **The Repository**
+The source code for The Vulkan-LoaderAndValidationLayer components is sponsored by Khronos and LunarG.
* [Khronos Vulkan-LoaderAndValidationLayers](https://github.com/KhronosGroup/Vulkan-LoaderAndValidationLayers)
-* [LunarG VulkanTools](https://github.com/LunarG/VulkanTools)
-* [LunarG VulkanSamples](https://github.com/LunarG/VulkanSamples)
-As a convenience, the contents of the Vulkan-LoaderAndValidationLayers repository are downstreamed into the VulkanTools and VulkanSamples repositories via a branch named `trunk`.
-This makes the VulkanTools and VulkanSamples easier to work with and avoids compatibility issues
-that might arise with Vulkan-LoaderAndValidationLayers components if they were obtained from a separate repository.
### **The Vulkan Ecosystem Needs Your Help**
@@ -23,7 +14,7 @@ there are always opportunities for anyone to help by contributing additional val
and tests for these validation checks.
If you desire to help in this area, please examine the
[issues list](https://github.com/KhronosGroup/Vulkan-LoaderAndValidationLayers/issues)
-in this repository and look for any unassigned issues that are of interest to you.
+in this repository and look for any issues that are of interest to you.
Of course, if you have your own work in mind, please open an issue to describe it and assign it to yourself.
Finally, please feel free to contact any of the developers that are actively contributing should you
wish to coordinate further.
@@ -32,11 +23,13 @@ later on this page.
Repository Issue labels:
-* _Incomplete_: These issues refer to missing validation checks that users have encountered during application development that would have been directly useful, and are high priority.
-* _Enhancement_: These issues refer to ideas for extending or improving the loader, demos, or validation layers.
* _Bug_: These issues refer to invalid or broken functionality and are the highest priority.
+* _Incomplete_: These issues refer to missing validation checks that users have encountered during application
+development that would have been directly useful, and are high priority.
+* _Enhancement_: These issues refer to ideas for extending or improving the loader, demos, or validation layers.
-If you choose to work on an issue that is already assigned, simply coordinate with the current assignee.
+It is the mainainers goal for all issues to be assigned within one business day of their submission. If you choose
+to work on an issue that is assigned, simply coordinate with the current assignee.
### **How to Submit Fixes**
@@ -45,20 +38,20 @@ If you choose to work on an issue that is already assigned, simply coordinate wi
* Use the existing GitHub forking and pull request process.
This will involve [forking the repository](https://help.github.com/articles/fork-a-repo/),
creating a branch with your commits, and then [submitting a pull request](https://help.github.com/articles/using-pull-requests/).
+* Please read and adhere to the style and process [guidelines](#coding conventions and formatting) enumerated below.
* Please base your fixes on the master branch. SDK branches are generally not updated except for critical fixes needed to repair an SDK release.
-* Please include the GitHub Issue number near the beginning of the commit text if applicable.
- * Example: "layers: GH123, Fix missing init"
-* If your changes are restricted only to files from the Vulkan-LoaderAndValidationLayers repository, please direct your pull request to that repository, instead of VulkanTools or VulkanSamples.
#### **Coding Conventions and Formatting**
* Use the **[Google style guide](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html)** for source code with the following exceptions:
* The column limit is 132 (as opposed to the default value 80). The clang-format tool will handle this. See below.
* The indent is 4 spaces instead of the default 2 spaces. Again, the clang-format tool will handle this.
- * If you can justify a reason for violating a rule in the guidelines, then you are free to do so. Be prepared to defend your decision during code review. This should be used responsibly. An example of a bad reason is "I don't like that rule." An example of a good reason is "This violates the style guide, but it improves type safety."
+ * If you can justify a reason for violating a rule in the guidelines, then you are free to do so. Be prepared to defend your
+decision during code review. This should be used responsibly. An example of a bad reason is "I don't like that rule." An example of
+a good reason is "This violates the style guide, but it improves type safety."
-* Run **clang-format** on your changes to maintain formatting
- * There are `.clang-format files` throughout the repository to define clang-format settings
+* Run **clang-format** on your changes to maintain consistent formatting
+ * There are `.clang-format files` present in the repository to define clang-format settings
which are found and used automatically by clang-format.
* A sample git workflow may look like:
@@ -69,14 +62,20 @@ If you choose to work on an issue that is already assigned, simply coordinate wi
> $ git add -u .
> $ git commit
-* **Format your git commit messages** consistently with the repo
- * Limit the subject line to 50 characters. Begin with a one-word component description followed by a colon (e.g. loader, layers, tests, etc.).
- * Separate subject from body with a blank line.
- * Wrap the body at 72 characters.
- * Capitalize the subject line.
- * Do not end the subject line with a period.
- * Use the body to explain what and why vs. how.
- * Use the imperative mood in the subject line. This just means to write it as a command (e.g. Fix the sprocket).
+* **Commit Messages**
+ * Limit the subject line to 50 characters -- this allows the information to display correctly in git/Github logs
+ * Begin subject line with a one-word component description followed by a colon (e.g. loader, layers, tests, etc.)
+ * Separate subject from body with a blank line
+ * Wrap the body at 72 characters
+ * Capitalize the subject line
+ * Do not end the subject line with a period
+ * Use the body to explain what and why vs. how
+ * Use the imperative mode in the subject line. This just means to write it as a command (e.g. Fix the sprocket)
+
+Strive for commits that implement a single or related set of functionality, using as many commits as is necessary (more is better).
+That said, please ensure that the repository compiles and passes tests without error for each commit in your pull request. Note
+that to be accepted into the repository, the pull request must [pass all tests](#testing your changes) on all supported platforms
+-- the automatic Github Travis and AppVeyor continuous integration features will assist in enforcing this requirement.
#### **Testing Your Changes**
* Run the existing tests in the repository before and after each if your commits to check for any regressions.
@@ -96,15 +95,17 @@ If you choose to work on an issue that is already assigned, simply coordinate wi
> run_all_tests.sh
-* On Windows, a quick sanity check can be run from inside Visual Studio -- just run the `vk_layer_validation_tests` project, or you can run `run_all_tests.ps1` from a PowerShell window
+* On Windows, a quick sanity check can be run from inside Visual Studio -- just run the `vk_layer_validation_tests` project,
+or you can run `run_all_tests.ps1` from a PowerShell window
* Note that some tests may fail with known issues or driver-specific problems.
The idea here is that your changes shouldn't change the test results, unless that was the intent of your changes.
* Run tests that explicitly exercise your changes.
* Feel free to subject your code changes to other tests as well!
+
#### **Special Considerations for Validation Layers**
-If you are submitting a change that adds a new validation check, you should also construct a "negative" test function.
+* **Validation Tests** If you are submitting a change that adds a new validation check, you should also construct a "negative" test function.
The negative test function purposely violates the validation rule that the new validation check is looking for.
The test should cause your new validation check to identify the violation and issue a validation error report.
And finally, the test should check that the validation error report is generated and consider the test as "passing"
@@ -112,6 +113,10 @@ if the report is received. Otherwise, the test should indicate "failure".
This new test should be added to the validation layer test program in the `tests` directory and contributed
at the same time as the new validation check itself, along with appropriate updates to `layers\vk_validation_error_database.txt`.
There are many existing validation tests in this directory that can be used as a starting point.
+* **Validation Checks** The majority of validation checks are carried out by the Core Validation layer. In general, this layer
+contains checks that require some amount of application state to carry out. In contrast, the parameter validation layer contains
+checks that require (mostly) no state at all. Please inquire if you are unsure of the location for your contribution. The other
+layers (threading, object_tracker, unique_objects) are more special-purpose and are mostly code-generated from the specification.
### **Contributor License Agreement (CLA)**