From f574d1029dff307a55bdcd643ca456586e58536a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bob Badour Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 20:46:55 -0800 Subject: [LSC] Add LOCAL_LICENSE_KINDS to system/libufdt Added SPDX-license-identifier-Apache-2.0 to: tests/libufdt_verify/Android.bp tests/src/Android.bp utils/src/Android.bp Added SPDX-license-identifier-Apache-2.0 SPDX-license-identifier-BSD to: Android.bp sysdeps/Android.bp Bug: 68860345 Bug: 151177513 Bug: 151953481 Test: m all Exempt-From-Owner-Approval: janitorial work Change-Id: I84d850aa50a3f06c6748f718fe4927f3d67ac6db --- Android.bp | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) (limited to 'Android.bp') diff --git a/Android.bp b/Android.bp index 76d69e5..e0fb5d9 100644 --- a/Android.bp +++ b/Android.bp @@ -12,6 +12,36 @@ // See the License for the specific language governing permissions and // limitations under the License. +package { + default_applicable_licenses: ["system_libufdt_license"], +} + +// Added automatically by a large-scale-change that took the approach of +// 'apply every license found to every target'. While this makes sure we respect +// every license restriction, it may not be entirely correct. +// +// e.g. GPL in an MIT project might only apply to the contrib/ directory. +// +// Please consider splitting the single license below into multiple licenses, +// taking care not to lose any license_kind information, and overriding the +// default license using the 'licenses: [...]' property on targets as needed. +// +// For unused files, consider creating a 'fileGroup' with "//visibility:private" +// to attach the license to, and including a comment whether the files may be +// used in the current project. +// See: http://go/android-license-faq +license { + name: "system_libufdt_license", + visibility: [":__subpackages__"], + license_kinds: [ + "SPDX-license-identifier-Apache-2.0", + "SPDX-license-identifier-BSD", + ], + license_text: [ + "NOTICE", + ], +} + subdirs = [ "sysdeps", "tests/libufdt_verify", -- cgit v1.2.3