1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
|
# Fuzzing binary-only programs with afl++
afl++, libfuzzer and others are great if you have the source code, and
it allows for very fast and coverage guided fuzzing.
However, if there is only the binary program and no source code available,
then standard `afl-fuzz -n` (non-instrumented mode) is not effective.
The following is a description of how these binaries can be fuzzed with afl++.
## TL;DR:
qemu_mode in persistent mode is the fastest - if the stability is
high enough. Otherwise try retrowrite, afl-dyninst and if these
fail too then try standard qemu_mode with AFL_ENTRYPOINT to where you need it.
If your target is a library use utils/afl_frida/.
If your target is non-linux then use unicorn_mode/.
## QEMU
Qemu is the "native" solution to the program.
It is available in the ./qemu_mode/ directory and once compiled it can
be accessed by the afl-fuzz -Q command line option.
It is the easiest to use alternative and even works for cross-platform binaries.
The speed decrease is at about 50%.
However various options exist to increase the speed:
- using AFL_ENTRYPOINT to move the forkserver entry to a later basic block in
the binary (+5-10% speed)
- using persistent mode [qemu_mode/README.persistent.md](../qemu_mode/README.persistent.md)
this will result in 150-300% overall speed increase - so 3-8x the original
qemu_mode speed!
- using AFL_CODE_START/AFL_CODE_END to only instrument specific parts
Note that there is also honggfuzz: [https://github.com/google/honggfuzz](https://github.com/google/honggfuzz)
which now has a qemu_mode, but its performance is just 1.5% ...
As it is included in afl++ this needs no URL.
## WINE+QEMU
Wine mode can run Win32 PE binaries with the QEMU instrumentation.
It needs Wine, python3 and the pefile python package installed.
As it is included in afl++ this needs no URL.
## UNICORN
Unicorn is a fork of QEMU. The instrumentation is, therefore, very similar.
In contrast to QEMU, Unicorn does not offer a full system or even userland
emulation. Runtime environment and/or loaders have to be written from scratch,
if needed. On top, block chaining has been removed. This means the speed boost
introduced in the patched QEMU Mode of afl++ cannot simply be ported over to
Unicorn. For further information, check out [unicorn_mode/README.md](../unicorn_mode/README.md).
As it is included in afl++ this needs no URL.
## AFL FRIDA
If you want to fuzz a binary-only shared library then you can fuzz it with
frida-gum via utils/afl_frida/, you will have to write a harness to
call the target function in the library, use afl-frida.c as a template.
## AFL UNTRACER
If you want to fuzz a binary-only shared library then you can fuzz it with
utils/afl_untracer/, use afl-untracer.c as a template.
It is slower than AFL FRIDA (see above).
## DYNINST
Dyninst is a binary instrumentation framework similar to Pintool and
Dynamorio (see far below). However whereas Pintool and Dynamorio work at
runtime, dyninst instruments the target at load time, and then let it run -
or save the binary with the changes.
This is great for some things, e.g. fuzzing, and not so effective for others,
e.g. malware analysis.
So what we can do with dyninst is taking every basic block, and put afl's
instrumention code in there - and then save the binary.
Afterwards we can just fuzz the newly saved target binary with afl-fuzz.
Sounds great? It is. The issue though - it is a non-trivial problem to
insert instructions, which change addresses in the process space, so that
everything is still working afterwards. Hence more often than not binaries
crash when they are run.
The speed decrease is about 15-35%, depending on the optimization options
used with afl-dyninst.
So if Dyninst works, it is the best option available. Otherwise it just
doesn't work well.
[https://github.com/vanhauser-thc/afl-dyninst](https://github.com/vanhauser-thc/afl-dyninst)
## RETROWRITE
If you have an x86/x86_64 binary that still has its symbols, is compiled
with position independant code (PIC/PIE) and does not use most of the C++
features then the retrowrite solution might be for you.
It decompiles to ASM files which can then be instrumented with afl-gcc.
It is at about 80-85% performance.
[https://github.com/HexHive/retrowrite](https://github.com/HexHive/retrowrite)
## MCSEMA
Theoretically you can also decompile to llvm IR with mcsema, and then
use llvm_mode to instrument the binary.
Good luck with that.
[https://github.com/lifting-bits/mcsema](https://github.com/lifting-bits/mcsema)
## INTEL-PT
If you have a newer Intel CPU, you can make use of Intels processor trace.
The big issue with Intel's PT is the small buffer size and the complex
encoding of the debug information collected through PT.
This makes the decoding very CPU intensive and hence slow.
As a result, the overall speed decrease is about 70-90% (depending on
the implementation and other factors).
There are two afl intel-pt implementations:
1. [https://github.com/junxzm1990/afl-pt](https://github.com/junxzm1990/afl-pt)
=> this needs Ubuntu 14.04.05 without any updates and the 4.4 kernel.
2. [https://github.com/hunter-ht-2018/ptfuzzer](https://github.com/hunter-ht-2018/ptfuzzer)
=> this needs a 4.14 or 4.15 kernel. the "nopti" kernel boot option must
be used. This one is faster than the other.
Note that there is also honggfuzz: https://github.com/google/honggfuzz
But its IPT performance is just 6%!
## CORESIGHT
Coresight is ARM's answer to Intel's PT.
There is no implementation so far which handles coresight and getting
it working on an ARM Linux is very difficult due to custom kernel building
on embedded systems is difficult. And finding one that has coresight in
the ARM chip is difficult too.
My guess is that it is slower than Qemu, but faster than Intel PT.
If anyone finds any coresight implementation for afl please ping me: vh@thc.org
## FRIDA
Frida is a dynamic instrumentation engine like Pintool, Dyninst and Dynamorio.
What is special is that it is written Python, and scripted with Javascript.
It is mostly used to reverse binaries on mobile phones however can be used
everywhere.
There is a WIP fuzzer available at [https://github.com/andreafioraldi/frida-fuzzer](https://github.com/andreafioraldi/frida-fuzzer)
There is also an early implementation in an AFL++ test branch:
[https://github.com/AFLplusplus/AFLplusplus/tree/frida](https://github.com/AFLplusplus/AFLplusplus/tree/frida)
## PIN & DYNAMORIO
Pintool and Dynamorio are dynamic instrumentation engines, and they can be
used for getting basic block information at runtime.
Pintool is only available for Intel x32/x64 on Linux, Mac OS and Windows,
whereas Dynamorio is additionally available for ARM and AARCH64.
Dynamorio is also 10x faster than Pintool.
The big issue with Dynamorio (and therefore Pintool too) is speed.
Dynamorio has a speed decrease of 98-99%
Pintool has a speed decrease of 99.5%
Hence Dynamorio is the option to go for if everything else fails, and Pintool
only if Dynamorio fails too.
Dynamorio solutions:
* [https://github.com/vanhauser-thc/afl-dynamorio](https://github.com/vanhauser-thc/afl-dynamorio)
* [https://github.com/mxmssh/drAFL](https://github.com/mxmssh/drAFL)
* [https://github.com/googleprojectzero/winafl/](https://github.com/googleprojectzero/winafl/) <= very good but windows only
Pintool solutions:
* [https://github.com/vanhauser-thc/afl-pin](https://github.com/vanhauser-thc/afl-pin)
* [https://github.com/mothran/aflpin](https://github.com/mothran/aflpin)
* [https://github.com/spinpx/afl_pin_mode](https://github.com/spinpx/afl_pin_mode) <= only old Pintool version supported
## Non-AFL solutions
There are many binary-only fuzzing frameworks.
Some are great for CTFs but don't work with large binaries, others are very
slow but have good path discovery, some are very hard to set-up ...
* QSYM: [https://github.com/sslab-gatech/qsym](https://github.com/sslab-gatech/qsym)
* Manticore: [https://github.com/trailofbits/manticore](https://github.com/trailofbits/manticore)
* S2E: [https://github.com/S2E](https://github.com/S2E)
* Tinyinst [https://github.com/googleprojectzero/TinyInst](https://github.com/googleprojectzero/TinyInst) (Mac/Windows only)
* ... please send me any missing that are good
## Closing words
That's it! News, corrections, updates? Send an email to vh@thc.org
|
