aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/javaparser-symbol-solver-core/src/main/java/com/github/javaparser/symbolsolver/resolution/typeinference/constraintformulas/TypeCompatibleWithType.java
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'javaparser-symbol-solver-core/src/main/java/com/github/javaparser/symbolsolver/resolution/typeinference/constraintformulas/TypeCompatibleWithType.java')
-rw-r--r--javaparser-symbol-solver-core/src/main/java/com/github/javaparser/symbolsolver/resolution/typeinference/constraintformulas/TypeCompatibleWithType.java122
1 files changed, 122 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/javaparser-symbol-solver-core/src/main/java/com/github/javaparser/symbolsolver/resolution/typeinference/constraintformulas/TypeCompatibleWithType.java b/javaparser-symbol-solver-core/src/main/java/com/github/javaparser/symbolsolver/resolution/typeinference/constraintformulas/TypeCompatibleWithType.java
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1c03064a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/javaparser-symbol-solver-core/src/main/java/com/github/javaparser/symbolsolver/resolution/typeinference/constraintformulas/TypeCompatibleWithType.java
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+package com.github.javaparser.symbolsolver.resolution.typeinference.constraintformulas;
+
+import com.github.javaparser.resolution.types.ResolvedType;
+import com.github.javaparser.symbolsolver.model.resolution.TypeSolver;
+import com.github.javaparser.symbolsolver.model.typesystem.ReferenceTypeImpl;
+import com.github.javaparser.symbolsolver.resolution.typeinference.BoundSet;
+import com.github.javaparser.symbolsolver.resolution.typeinference.ConstraintFormula;
+import com.github.javaparser.symbolsolver.resolution.typesolvers.ReflectionTypeSolver;
+
+import static com.github.javaparser.symbolsolver.resolution.typeinference.TypeHelper.isCompatibleInALooseInvocationContext;
+import static com.github.javaparser.symbolsolver.resolution.typeinference.TypeHelper.isProperType;
+
+/**
+ * A type S is compatible in a loose invocation context with type T
+ *
+ * @author Federico Tomassetti
+ */
+public class TypeCompatibleWithType extends ConstraintFormula {
+ private ResolvedType s;
+ private ResolvedType t;
+ private TypeSolver typeSolver;
+
+ public TypeCompatibleWithType(TypeSolver typeSolver, ResolvedType s, ResolvedType t) {
+ this.typeSolver = typeSolver;
+ this.s = s;
+ this.t = t;
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public ReductionResult reduce(BoundSet currentBoundSet) {
+ // A constraint formula of the form ‹S → T› is reduced as follows:
+ //
+ // 1. If S and T are proper types, the constraint reduces to true if S is compatible in a loose invocation context with T (§5.3), and false otherwise.
+
+ if (isProperType(s) && isProperType(t)) {
+ if (isCompatibleInALooseInvocationContext(s, t)) {
+ return ReductionResult.trueResult();
+ } else {
+ return ReductionResult.falseResult();
+ }
+ }
+
+ // 2. Otherwise, if S is a primitive type, let S' be the result of applying boxing conversion (§5.1.7) to S. Then the constraint reduces to ‹S' → T›.
+
+ if (s.isPrimitive()) {
+ ReflectionTypeSolver typeSolver = new ReflectionTypeSolver();
+ ResolvedType sFirst = new ReferenceTypeImpl(typeSolver.solveType(s.asPrimitive().getBoxTypeQName()), typeSolver);
+ return ReductionResult.oneConstraint(new TypeCompatibleWithType(typeSolver, sFirst, t));
+ }
+
+ // 3. Otherwise, if T is a primitive type, let T' be the result of applying boxing conversion (§5.1.7) to T. Then the constraint reduces to ‹S = T'›.
+
+ if (t.isPrimitive()) {
+ ReflectionTypeSolver typeSolver = new ReflectionTypeSolver();
+ ResolvedType tFirst = new ReferenceTypeImpl(typeSolver.solveType(t.asPrimitive().getBoxTypeQName()), typeSolver);
+ return ReductionResult.oneConstraint(new TypeSameAsType(s, tFirst));
+ }
+
+ // The fourth and fifth cases are implicit uses of unchecked conversion (§5.1.9). These, along with any use of
+ // unchecked conversion in the first case, may result in compile-time unchecked warnings, and may influence a
+ // method's invocation type (§15.12.2.6).
+
+ // 4. Otherwise, if T is a parameterized type of the form G<T1, ..., Tn>, and there exists no type of the
+ // form G<...> that is a supertype of S, but the raw type G is a supertype of S, then the constraint reduces
+ // to true.
+
+ if (t.isReferenceType() && !t.asReferenceType().getTypeDeclaration().getTypeParameters().isEmpty()) {
+ // FIXME I really cannot understand what the specification means...
+
+ // there exists a type of the form G<...> that is a supertype of S?
+ boolean condition1 = t.isAssignableBy(s);
+
+ // the raw type G is a supertype of S
+ ResolvedType G = t.asReferenceType().toRawType();
+ boolean condition2 = G.isAssignableBy(s);
+
+ if (!condition1 && condition2) {
+ return ReductionResult.trueResult();
+ }
+
+ //throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
+ }
+
+ // 5. Otherwise, if T is an array type of the form G<T1, ..., Tn>[]k, and there exists no type of the form
+ // G<...>[]k that is a supertype of S, but the raw type G[]k is a supertype of S, then the constraint
+ // reduces to true. (The notation []k indicates an array type of k dimensions.)
+
+ if (t.isArray()) {
+ throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
+ }
+
+ // 6. Otherwise, the constraint reduces to ‹S <: T›
+
+ return ReductionResult.empty().withConstraint(new TypeSubtypeOfType(typeSolver, s, t));
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public boolean equals(Object o) {
+ if (this == o) return true;
+ if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass()) return false;
+
+ TypeCompatibleWithType that = (TypeCompatibleWithType) o;
+
+ if (!s.equals(that.s)) return false;
+ return t.equals(that.t);
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public int hashCode() {
+ int result = s.hashCode();
+ result = 31 * result + t.hashCode();
+ return result;
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public String toString() {
+ return "TypeCompatibleWithType{" +
+ "s=" + s +
+ ", t=" + t +
+ '}';
+ }
+}