1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title>SWIG and C++11</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="style.css">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff">
<H1><a name="CPlusPlus11"></a>7 SWIG and C++11</H1>
<!-- INDEX -->
<div class="sectiontoc">
<ul>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_introduction">Introduction</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_core_language_changes">Core language changes</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_rvalue_reference_and_move_semantics">Rvalue reference and move semantics</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_generalized_constant_expressions">Generalized constant expressions</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_extern_template">Extern template</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_initializer_lists">Initializer lists</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_uniform_initialization">Uniform initialization</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_type_inference">Type inference</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_range_based_for_loop">Range-based for-loop</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_lambda_functions_and_expressions">Lambda functions and expressions</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_alternate_function_syntax">Alternate function syntax</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_object_construction_improvement">Object construction improvement</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_null_pointer_constant">Null pointer constant</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_strongly_typed_enumerations">Strongly typed enumerations</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_double_angle_brackets">Double angle brackets</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_explicit_conversion_operators">Explicit conversion operators</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_alias_templates">Alias templates</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_unrestricted_unions">Unrestricted unions</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_variadic_templates">Variadic templates</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_new_string_literals">New string literals</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_user_defined_literals">User-defined literals</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_thread_local_storage">Thread-local storage</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_defaulted_deleted">Explicitly defaulted functions and deleted functions</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_type_long_long_int">Type long long int</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_static_assertions">Static assertions</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_allow_sizeof_to_work_on_members_of_classes_without_an_explicit_object">Allow sizeof to work on members of classes without an explicit object</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_noexcept">Exception specifications and noexcept</a>
</ul>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_standard_library_changes">Standard library changes</a>
<ul>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_threading_facilities">Threading facilities</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_tuple_types">Tuple types and hash tables</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_regular_expressions">Regular expressions</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_general_purpose_smart_pointers">General-purpose smart pointers</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_extensible_random_number_facility">Extensible random number facility</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_wrapper_reference">Wrapper reference</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_polymorphous_wrappers_for_function_objects">Polymorphous wrappers for function objects</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_type_traits_for_metaprogramming">Type traits for metaprogramming</a>
<li><a href="#CPlusPlus11_uniform_method_for_computing_return_type_of_function_objects">Uniform method for computing return type of function objects</a>
</ul>
</ul>
</div>
<!-- INDEX -->
<H2><a name="CPlusPlus11_introduction"></a>7.1 Introduction</H2>
<p>This chapter gives you a brief overview about the SWIG
implementation of the C++11 standard. This part of SWIG is still a work in
progress. Initial C++11 support for SWIG was written during the
Google Summer of Code 2009 period.</p>
<p>SWIG supports all the new C++ syntax changes with some minor limitations
(decltype expressions, variadic templates number). Wrappers for the
new STL types (unordered_ containers, result_of, tuples) are not supported
yet.</p>
<H2><a name="CPlusPlus11_core_language_changes"></a>7.2 Core language changes</H2>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_rvalue_reference_and_move_semantics"></a>7.2.1 Rvalue reference and move semantics</H3>
<p>SWIG correctly parses the new operator && the same as the reference operator &.</p>
<p>The wrapper for the following code is correctly produced:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
class MyClass {
MyClass(MyClass&& p) : ptr(p.ptr) {p.ptr = 0;}
MyClass& operator=(MyClass&& p) {
std::swap(ptr, p.ptr);
return *this;
}
};
</pre></div>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_generalized_constant_expressions"></a>7.2.2 Generalized constant expressions</H3>
<p>SWIG correctly parses the keyword <tt>constexpr</tt>, but ignores its functionality. Constant functions cannot be used as constants.</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
constexpr int myConstFunc() { return 10; }
const int a = myConstFunc(); // results in error
</pre></div>
<p>Users needs to use values or predefined constants when defining the new constant value:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
#define MY_CONST 10
constexpr int myConstFunc() { return MY_CONST; }
const int a = MY_CONST; // ok
</pre></div>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_extern_template"></a>7.2.3 Extern template</H3>
<p>SWIG correctly parses the keywords <tt>extern template</tt>. However, the explicit template instantiation is not used by SWIG, a <tt>%template</tt> is still required.</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
extern template class std::vector<MyClass>; // explicit instantiation
...
class MyClass {
public:
int a;
int b;
};
</pre></div>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_initializer_lists"></a>7.2.4 Initializer lists</H3>
<p>
Initializer lists are very much a C++ compiler construct and are not very accessible from wrappers as
they are intended for compile time initialization of classes using the special <tt>std::initializer_list</tt> type.
SWIG detects usage of initializer lists and will emit a special informative warning each time one is used:
</p>
<div class="shell">
<pre>
example.i:33: Warning 476: Initialization using std::initializer_list.
</pre>
</div>
<p>
Initializer lists usually appear in constructors but can appear in any function or method.
They often appear in constructors which are overloaded with alternative approaches to initializing a class,
such as the std container's push_back method for adding elements to a container.
The recommended approach then is to simply ignore the initializer-list constructor, for example:
</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
%ignore Container::Container(std::initializer_list<int>);
class Container {
public:
Container(std::initializer_list<int>); // initializer-list constructor
Container();
void push_back(const int &);
...
};
</pre></div>
<p>Alternatively you could modify the class and add another constructor for initialization by some other means,
for example by a <tt>std::vector</tt>:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
%include <std_vector.i>
class Container {
public:
Container(const std::vector<int> &);
Container(std::initializer_list<int>); // initializer-list constructor
Container();
void push_back(const int &);
...
};
</pre></div>
<p>And then call this constructor from your target language, for example, in Python, the following will call the constructor taking the <tt>std::vector</tt>:</p>
<div class="targetlang"><pre>
>>> c = Container( [1,2,3,4] )
</pre></div>
<p>
If you are unable to modify the class being wrapped, consider ignoring the initializer-list constructor and using
%extend to add in an alternative constructor:
</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
%include <std_vector.i>
%extend Container {
Container(const std::vector<int> &elements) {
Container *c = new Container();
for (int element : elements)
c->push_back(element);
return c;
}
}
%ignore Container::Container(std::initializer_list<int>);
class Container {
public:
Container(std::initializer_list<int>); // initializer-list constructor
Container();
void push_back(const int &);
...
};
</pre></div>
<p>
The above makes the wrappers look is as if the class had been declared as follows:
</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
%include <std_vector.i>
class Container {
public:
Container(const std::vector<int> &);
// Container(std::initializer_list<int>); // initializer-list constructor (ignored)
Container();
void push_back(const int &);
...
};
</pre></div>
<p>
<tt>std::initializer_list</tt> is simply a container that can only be initialized at compile time.
As it is just a C++ type, it is possible to write typemaps for a target language container to map onto
<tt>std::initializer_list</tt>. However, this can only be done for a fixed number of elements as
initializer lists are not designed to be constructed with a variable number of arguments at runtime.
The example below is a very simple approach which ignores any parameters passed in and merely initializes
with a fixed list of fixed integer values chosen at compile time:
</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
%typemap(in) std::initializer_list<int> {
$1 = {10, 20, 30, 40, 50};
}
class Container {
public:
Container(std::initializer_list<int>); // initializer-list constructor
Container();
void push_back(const int &);
...
};
</pre></div>
<p>
Any attempt at passing in values from the target language will be ignored and replaced by <tt>{10, 20, 30, 40, 50}</tt>.
Needless to say, this approach is very limited, but could be improved upon, but only slightly.
A typemap could be written to map a fixed number of elements on to the <tt>std::initializer_list</tt>,
but with values decided at runtime.
The typemaps would be target language specific.
</p>
<p>
Note that the default typemap for <tt>std::initializer_list</tt> does nothing but issue the warning
and hence any user supplied typemaps will override it and suppress the warning.
</p>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_uniform_initialization"></a>7.2.5 Uniform initialization</H3>
<p>The curly brackets {} for member initialization are fully
supported by SWIG:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
struct BasicStruct {
int x;
double y;
};
struct AltStruct {
AltStruct(int x, double y) : x_{x}, y_{y} {}
int x_;
double y_;
};
BasicStruct var1{5, 3.2}; // only fills the struct components
AltStruct var2{2, 4.3}; // calls the constructor
</pre></div>
<p>Uniform initialization does not affect usage from the target language, for example in Python:</p>
<div class="targetlang"><pre>
>>> a = AltStruct(10, 142.15)
>>> a.x_
10
>>> a.y_
142.15
</pre></div>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_type_inference"></a>7.2.6 Type inference</H3>
<p>SWIG supports <tt>decltype()</tt> with some limitations. Single
variables are allowed, however, expressions are not supported yet. For
example, the following code will work:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
int i;
decltype(i) j;
</pre></div>
<p>However, using an expression inside the decltype results in syntax error:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
int i; int j;
decltype(i+j) k; // syntax error
</pre></div>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_range_based_for_loop"></a>7.2.7 Range-based for-loop</H3>
<p>This feature is part of the implementation block only. SWIG
ignores it.</p>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_lambda_functions_and_expressions"></a>7.2.8 Lambda functions and expressions</H3>
<p>SWIG correctly parses most of the Lambda functions syntax. For example:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
auto val = [] { return something; };
auto sum = [](int x, int y) { return x+y; };
auto sum = [](int x, int y) -> int { return x+y; };
</pre></div>
<p>The lambda functions are removed from the wrappers for now, because of the lack of support
for closures (scope of the lambda functions) in the target languages.</p>
<p>
Lambda functions used to create variables can also be parsed, but due to limited support of <tt>auto</tt> when
the type is deduced from the expression, the variables are simply ignored.
</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
auto six = [](int x, int y) { return x+y; }(4, 2);
</pre></div>
<p>
Better support should be available in a later release.
</p>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_alternate_function_syntax"></a>7.2.9 Alternate function syntax</H3>
<p>SWIG fully supports the new definition of functions. For example:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
struct SomeStruct {
int FuncName(int x, int y);
};
</pre></div>
<p>can now be written as in C++11:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
struct SomeStruct {
auto FuncName(int x, int y) -> int;
};
auto SomeStruct::FuncName(int x, int y) -> int {
return x + y;
}
</pre></div>
<p>The usage in the target languages remains the same, for example in Python:</p>
<div class="targetlang"><pre>
>>> a = SomeStruct()
>>> a.FuncName(10,5)
15
</pre></div>
<p>SWIG will also deal with type inference for the return type, as per the limitations described earlier. For example:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
auto square(float a, float b) -> decltype(a);
</pre></div>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_object_construction_improvement"></a>7.2.10 Object construction improvement</H3>
<p>
SWIG is able to handle constructor delegation, such as:
</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
class A {
public:
int a;
int b;
int c;
A() : A( 10 ) {}
A(int aa) : A(aa, 20) {}
A(int aa, int bb) : A(aa, bb, 30) {}
A(int aa, int bb, int cc) { a=aa; b=bb; c=cc; }
};
</pre></div>
<p>
Constructor inheritance is parsed correctly, but the additional constructors are not currently added to the derived proxy class in the target language. Example is shown below:
<!--
The extra constructors provided by the <tt>using</tt> syntax will add the appropriate constructors into the target language proxy derived classes.
In the example below a wrapper for the <tt>DerivedClass(int)</tt> is added to <tt>DerivedClass</tt>:
-->
</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
class BaseClass {
public:
BaseClass(int iValue);
};
class DerivedClass: public BaseClass {
public:
using BaseClass::BaseClass; // Adds DerivedClass(int) constructor
};
</pre></div>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_null_pointer_constant"></a>7.2.11 Null pointer constant</H3>
<p>The <tt>nullptr</tt> constant is largely unimportant in wrappers. In the few places it has an effect, it is treated like <tt>NULL</tt>.</p>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_strongly_typed_enumerations"></a>7.2.12 Strongly typed enumerations</H3>
<p>SWIG parses the new <tt>enum class</tt> syntax and forward declarator for the enums:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
enum class MyEnum : unsigned int;
</pre></div>
<p>The strongly typed enumerations are treated the same as the ordinary and anonymous enums.
This is because SWIG doesn't support nested classes. This is usually not a problem, however,
there may be some name clashes. For example, the following code:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
class Color {
enum class PrintingColors : unsigned int {
Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, Black
};
enum class BasicColors {
Red, Green, Blue
};
enum class AllColors {
// produces warnings because of duplicate names
Yellow, Orange, Red, Magenta, Blue, Cyan, Green, Pink, Black, White
};
};
</pre></div>
<p>A workaround is to write these as a series of separated classes containing anonymous enums:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
class PrintingColors {
enum : unsigned int {
Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, Black
};
};
class BasicColors {
enum : unsigned int {
Red, Green, Blue
};
};
class AllColors {
enum : unsigned int {
Yellow, Orange, Red, Magenta, Blue, Cyan, Green, Pink, Black, White
};
};
</pre></div>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_double_angle_brackets"></a>7.2.13 Double angle brackets</H3>
<p>SWIG correctly parses the symbols >> as closing the
template block, if found inside it at the top level, or as the right
shift operator >> otherwise.</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
std::vector<std::vector<int>> myIntTable;
</pre></div>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_explicit_conversion_operators"></a>7.2.14 Explicit conversion operators</H3>
<p>SWIG correctly parses the keyword <tt>explicit</tt> both for operators and constructors.
For example:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
class U {
public:
int u;
};
class V {
public:
int v;
};
class TestClass {
public:
//implicit converting constructor
TestClass( U const &val ) { t=val.u; }
// explicit constructor
explicit TestClass( V const &val ) { t=val.v; }
int t;
};
</pre></div>
<p>
The usage of explicit constructors and operators is somehow specific to C++ when assigning the value
of one object to another one of different type or translating one type to another. It requires both operator and function overloading features,
which are not supported by the majority of SWIG target languages. Also the constructors and operators are not particulary useful in any
SWIG target languages, because all use their own facilities (eg. classes Cloneable and Comparable in Java)
to achieve particular copy and compare behaviours.
</p>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_alias_templates"></a>7.2.15 Alias templates</H3>
<p>
The following is an example of an alias template:
<div class="code"><pre>
template< typename T1, typename T2, int >
class SomeType {
T1 a;
T2 b;
int c;
};
template< typename T2 >
using TypedefName = SomeType<char*, T2, 5>;
</pre></div>
<p>
These are partially supported as SWIG will parse these and identify them, however, they are ignored as they are not added to the type system. A warning such as the following is issued:
</p>
<div class="shell">
<pre>
example.i:13: Warning 342: The 'using' keyword in template aliasing is not fully supported yet.
</pre>
</div>
<p>
Similarly for non-template type aliasing:
</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
using PFD = void (*)(double); // New introduced syntax
</pre></div>
<p>
A warning will be issued:
</p>
<div class="shell">
<pre>
example.i:17: Warning 341: The 'using' keyword in type aliasing is not fully supported yet.
</pre>
</div>
<p>The equivalent old style typedefs can be used as a workaround:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
typedef void (*PFD)(double); // The old style
</pre></div>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_unrestricted_unions"></a>7.2.16 Unrestricted unions</H3>
<p>SWIG fully supports any type inside a union even if it does not
define a trivial constructor. For example, the wrapper for the following
code correctly provides access to all members in the union:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
struct point {
point() {}
point(int x, int y) : x_(x), y_(y) {}
int x_, y_;
};
#include <new> // For placement 'new' in the constructor below
union P {
int z;
double w;
point p; // Illegal in C++03; legal in C++11.
// Due to the point member, a constructor definition is required.
P() {
new(&p) point();
}
} p1;
</pre></div>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_variadic_templates"></a>7.2.17 Variadic templates</H3>
<p>SWIG supports the variadic templates syntax (inside the <>
block, variadic class inheritance and variadic constructor and
initializers) with some limitations. The following code is correctly parsed:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
template <typename... BaseClasses> class ClassName : public BaseClasses... {
public:
ClassName (BaseClasses&&... baseClasses) : BaseClasses(baseClasses)... {}
}
</pre></div>
<p>
For now however, the <tt>%template</tt> directive only accepts one parameter substitution
for the variable template parameters.
</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
%template(MyVariant1) ClassName<> // zero argument not supported yet
%template(MyVariant2) ClassName<int> // ok
%template(MyVariant3) ClassName<int, int> // too many arguments not supported yet
</pre></div>
<p>Support for the variadic <tt>sizeof()</tt> function is correctly parsed:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
const int SIZE = sizeof...(ClassName<int, int>);
</pre></div>
<p>
In the above example <tt>SIZE</tt> is of course wrapped as a constant.
</p>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_new_string_literals"></a>7.2.18 New string literals</H3>
<p>SWIG supports unicode string constants and raw string literals.</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
// New string literals
wstring aa = L"Wide string";
const char *bb = u8"UTF-8 string";
const char16_t *cc = u"UTF-16 string";
const char32_t *dd = U"UTF-32 string";
// Raw string literals
const char *xx = ")I'm an \"ascii\" \\ string.";
const char *ee = R"XXX()I'm an "ascii" \ string.)XXX"; // same as xx
wstring ff = LR"XXX(I'm a "raw wide" \ string.)XXX";
const char *gg = u8R"XXX(I'm a "raw UTF-8" \ string.)XXX";
const char16_t *hh = uR"XXX(I'm a "raw UTF-16" \ string.)XXX";
const char32_t *ii = UR"XXX(I'm a "raw UTF-32" \ string.)XXX";
</pre></div>
<p>Note: SWIG currently incorrectly parses the odd number of double quotes
inside the string due to SWIG's C++ preprocessor.</p>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_user_defined_literals"></a>7.2.19 User-defined literals</H3>
<p>
SWIG parses the declaration of user-defined literals, that is, the <tt>operator "" _mysuffix()</tt> function syntax.
</p>
<p>
Some examples are the raw literal:
</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
OutputType operator "" _myRawLiteral(const char * value);
</pre></div>
<p>
numeric cooked literals:
</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
OutputType operator "" _mySuffixIntegral(unsigned long long);
OutputType operator "" _mySuffixFloat(long double);
</pre></div>
<p>
and cooked string literals:
</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
OutputType operator "" _mySuffix(const char * string_values, size_t num_chars);
OutputType operator "" _mySuffix(const wchar_t * string_values, size_t num_chars);
OutputType operator "" _mySuffix(const char16_t * string_values, size_t num_chars);
OutputType operator "" _mySuffix(const char32_t * string_values, size_t num_chars);
</pre></div>
<p>
Like other operators that SWIG parses, a warning is given about renaming the operator in order for it to be wrapped:
</p>
<div class="shell"><pre>
example.i:27: Warning 503: Can't wrap 'operator "" _myRawLiteral' unless renamed to a valid identifier.
</pre></div>
<p>
If %rename is used, then it can be called like any other wrapped method.
Currently you need to specify the full declaration including parameters for %rename:
</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
%rename(MyRawLiteral) operator"" _myRawLiteral(const char * value);
</pre></div>
<p>
Or if you just wish to ignore it altogether:
</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
%ignore operator "" _myRawLiteral(const char * value);
</pre></div>
<p>
Note that use of user-defined literals such as the following still give a syntax error:
</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
OutputType var1 = "1234"_suffix;
OutputType var2 = 1234_suffix;
OutputType var3 = 3.1416_suffix;
</pre></div>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_thread_local_storage"></a>7.2.20 Thread-local storage</H3>
<p>SWIG correctly parses the <tt>thread_local</tt> keyword. For example, variable
reachable by the current thread can be defined as:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
struct A {
static thread_local int val;
};
thread_local int global_val;
</pre></div>
<p>
The use of the <tt>thread_local</tt> storage specifier does not affect the wrapping process; it does not modify
the wrapper code compared to when it is not specified.
A variable will be thread local if accessed from different threads from the target language in the
same way that it will be thread local if accessed from C++ code.
</p>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_defaulted_deleted"></a>7.2.21 Explicitly defaulted functions and deleted functions</H3>
<p>SWIG handles explicitly defaulted functions, that is, <tt>= default</tt> added to a function declaration. Deleted definitions, which are also called deleted functions, have <tt>= delete</tt> added to the function declaration.
For example:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
struct NonCopyable {
NonCopyable& operator=(const NonCopyable&) = delete; /* Removes operator= */
NonCopyable(const NonCopyable&) = delete; /* Removed copy constructor */
NonCopyable() = default; /* Explicitly allows the empty constructor */
void *operator new(std::size_t) = delete; /* Removes new NonCopyable */
};
</pre></div>
<p>
Wrappers for deleted functions will not be available in the target language.
Wrappers for defaulted functions will of course be available in the target language.
Explicitly defaulted functions have no direct effect for SWIG wrapping as the declaration is handled
much like any other method declaration parsed by SWIG.
</p>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_type_long_long_int"></a>7.2.22 Type long long int</H3>
<p>SWIG correctly parses and uses the new <tt>long long</tt> type already introduced in C99 some time ago.</p>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_static_assertions"></a>7.2.23 Static assertions</H3>
<p>SWIG correctly parses and calls the new <tt>static_assert</tt> function.</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
template <typename T>
struct Check {
static_assert(sizeof(int) <= sizeof(T), "not big enough");
};
</pre></div>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_allow_sizeof_to_work_on_members_of_classes_without_an_explicit_object"></a>7.2.24 Allow sizeof to work on members of classes without an explicit object</H3>
<p>SWIG correctly calls the sizeof() on types as well as on the
objects. For example:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
struct A {
int member;
};
const int SIZE = sizeof(A::member); // does not work with C++03. Okay with C++11
</pre></div>
<p>In Python:</p>
<div class="targetlang"><pre>
>>> SIZE
8
</pre></div>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_noexcept"></a>7.2.25 Exception specifications and noexcept</H3>
<p>
C++11 added in the noexcept specification to exception specifications to indicate that a function simply may or may not throw an exception, without actually naming any exception.
SWIG understands these, although there isn't any useful way that this information can be taken advantage of by target languages,
so it is as good as ignored during the wrapping process.
Below are some examples of noexcept in function declarations:
</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
static void noex1() noexcept;
int noex2(int) noexcept(true);
int noex3(int, bool) noexcept(false);
</pre></div>
<H2><a name="CPlusPlus11_standard_library_changes"></a>7.3 Standard library changes</H2>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_threading_facilities"></a>7.3.1 Threading facilities</H3>
<p>SWIG does not currently wrap or use any of the new threading
classes introduced (thread, mutex, locks, condition variables, task). The main reason is that
SWIG target languages offer their own threading facilities that do not rely on C++.</p>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_tuple_types"></a>7.3.2 Tuple types and hash tables</H3>
<p>SWIG does not wrap the new tuple types and the unordered_ container classes yet. Variadic template support is working so it is possible to
include the tuple header file; it is parsed without any problems.</p>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_regular_expressions"></a>7.3.3 Regular expressions</H3>
<p>SWIG does not wrap the new C++11 regular expressions classes, because the SWIG target languages use their own facilities for this.</p>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_general_purpose_smart_pointers"></a>7.3.4 General-purpose smart pointers</H3>
<p>
SWIG provides special smart pointer handling for <tt>std::tr1::shared_ptr</tt> in the same way it has support for <tt>boost::shared_ptr</tt>.
There is no special smart pointer handling available for <tt>std::weak_ptr</tt> and <tt>std::unique_ptr</tt>.
</p>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_extensible_random_number_facility"></a>7.3.5 Extensible random number facility</H3>
<p>This feature extends and standardizes the standard library only and does not effect the C++ language and SWIG.</p>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_wrapper_reference"></a>7.3.6 Wrapper reference</H3>
<p>The new ref and cref classes are used to instantiate a parameter as a reference of a template function. For example:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
void f( int &r ) { r++; }
// Template function.
template< class F, class P > void g( F f, P t ) { f(t); }
int main() {
int i = 0 ;
g( f, i ) ; // 'g<void ( int &r ), int>' is instantiated
// then 'i' will not be modified.
cout << i << endl ; // Output -> 0
g( f, ref(i) ) ; // 'g<void(int &r),reference_wrapper<int>>' is instantiated
// then 'i' will be modified.
cout << i << endl ; // Output -> 1
}
</pre></div>
<p>The ref and cref classes are not wrapped by SWIG because the SWIG target languages do not support referencing.</p>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_polymorphous_wrappers_for_function_objects"></a>7.3.7 Polymorphous wrappers for function objects</H3>
<p>
SWIG supports functor classes in some languages in a very natural way.
However nothing is provided yet for the new <tt>std::function</tt> template.
SWIG will parse usage of the template like any other template.
</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
%rename(__call__) Test::operator(); // Default renaming used for Python
struct Test {
bool operator()(int x, int y); // function object
};
#include <functional>
std::function<void (int, int)> pF = Test; // function template wrapper
</pre></div>
<p>
Example of supported usage of the plain functor from Python is shown below.
It does not involve <tt>std::function</tt>.
</p>
<div class="targetlang"><pre>
t = Test()
b = t(1,2) # invoke C++ function object
</pre></div>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_type_traits_for_metaprogramming"></a>7.3.8 Type traits for metaprogramming</H3>
<p>The new C++ metaprogramming is useful at compile time and is aimed specifically for C++ development:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
// First way of operating.
template< bool B > struct algorithm {
template< class T1, class T2 > int do_it( T1&, T2& ) { /*...*/ }
};
// Second way of operating.
template<> struct algorithm<true> {
template< class T1, class T2 > int do_it( T1, T2 ) { /*...*/ }
};
// Instantiating 'elaborate' will automatically instantiate the correct way to operate.
template< class T1, class T2 > int elaborate( T1 A, T2 B ) {
// Use the second way only if 'T1' is an integer and if 'T2' is
// in floating point, otherwise use the first way.
return algorithm< is_integral<T1>::value && is_floating_point<T2>::value >::do_it( A, B );
}
</pre></div>
<p>SWIG correctly parses the template specialization, template types and values inside the <> block and the new helper functions: is_convertible, is_integral, is_const etc.
However, SWIG still explicitly requires concrete types when using the <tt>%template</tt> directive, so the C++ metaprogramming features are not really of interest at runtime in the target languages.</p>
<H3><a name="CPlusPlus11_uniform_method_for_computing_return_type_of_function_objects"></a>7.3.9 Uniform method for computing return type of function objects</H3>
<p>SWIG does not wrap the new result_of class introduced in the <functional> header and map the result_of::type to the concrete type yet. For example:</p>
<div class="code"><pre>
%inline %{
#include <functional>
double square(double x) {
return (x * x);
}
template<class Fun, class Arg>
typename std::result_of<Fun(Arg)>::type test_result_impl(Fun fun, Arg arg) {
return fun(arg);
}
%}
%template(test_result) test_result_impl<double(*)(double), double>;
%constant double (*SQUARE)(double) = square;
</pre></div>
<p>will result in:</p>
<div class="targetlang"><pre>
>>> test_result_impl(SQUARE, 5.0)
<SWIG Object of type 'std::result_of< Fun(Arg) >::type *' at 0x7faf99ed8a50>
</pre></div>
<p>Instead, please use <tt>decltype()</tt> where possible for now.</p>
</body>
</html>
|
